DataCite requires only a small number of descriptive elements in order to register a resource for a DOI: the creator(s), title, publisher (defined as “the entity that holds, archives, publishes prints, distributes, releases, issues, or produces the resource), and publication year (defined as “the year when the data was or will be made publicly available.”)
This past winter, the Metadata Working Group has received several comments and questions about what to do when the publication year is unknown, and/or there is confusion about whether or not to describe the original object or its digital surrogate. After considerable discussion, the Working Group members have decided to offer some additional guidance to users of the Metadata Schema. We will be making immediate additions to the documentation in the following ways.
Publication Year – additional guidance
PublicationYear : the year when the data was or will be made publicly available. In the case of datasets, “publish” is understood to mean making the data available on a specific date to the community of researchers.
- If that date cannot be determined, use the date of registration.
- If an embargo period has been in effect, use the date when the embargo period ends.
- If there is no standard publication year value, use the date that would be preferred from a citation perspective.
Digitised version of physical object
If the DOI is being used to identify a digitised version of an original item, the recommended approach is to supply the PublicationYear for the digital version and not the original object.
The Title field may be used to convey the approximate or known date of the original object. Other metadata properties available for additional date information about the object include: Subject and Description. However, only Title will be part of the citation.
If the DOI is being used to identify the original object and the publication date of this is unknown or not standard then we recommend the following:
- If there is no standard publication year value, use the date that would be preferred from a citation perspective.
If you have questions about this or other DataCite Metadata Schema issues, please visit our discussion forum.